MORTGAGE FRAUD WAS NOT ONLY NEVER FIXED, BUT IT WAS ALSO NEVER CHANGED AT ALL. FORECLOSING PARTIES ARE STILL ASSIGNING MORTGAGES AND DEEDS OF TRUST TO TRANSFER THE OWNERSHIP OF YOUR DEBT. THE SUPREME COURT MADE IT CLEAR THAT AN ASSIGNMENT OF A MORTGAGE HAS NO EFFECT... IN 1872!

Friday, July 31, 2020

WHY FORECLOSURE FRAUD CASES CANNOT BE WON NORMALLY...LIKE MOST CONTRACT LAW CASES IT IS THE COURT'S INHERENT BIAS & IGNORANCE AND THE BETRAYAL OF THEIR OATH TO THE CONSTITUTION

"When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hang on." 
                                                                                        -Franklin D. Roosevelt



After nine years of fighting Promissory Note and Mortgage Fraud and never actually losing a case (nor ever quite winning outright in a normal way), I have figured out exactly why a case cannot be won by a borrower in any conventional way, yet winning should always have been a dunk shot if adjudicated correctly according to the constitution. I was dumbfounded. I have nearly stopped helping others, at least until  I prove convincingly that what I learned was right. Well, I am about to find out.


"CASES HAVE NOT BEEN ADJUDICATED CORRECTLY"?


By Danny Hammond


If you have tried to take your mortgage fraud case to court and you were absolutely convinced that you were a victim of fraud and you still want to fight your foreclosure, then you need foreclosure defenses to stop the judge from saying or demonstrating in any way his bias against borrowers or to completely dismiss all of the real facts in all cases.

 

I know how your civil rights work. What you believed so far is true and you were right. You just didn't have the proper info. You were fighting the wrong fight. If you have not taken your case to court yet, the above will happen when you do. I am using the simplest and most direct strategies to

 

overturn, or vacate, all foreclosures.  The founding fathers knew that one-day judges would do this.  they wrote the remedy into the constitution. 

 

It has been there waiting for this time since 1787.   CONTINUE READING

 

 

WOULD YOU LIKE A FREE ASSESSMENT

OF YOUR FORECLOSURE CASE? 

FILL OUT THE FORM CLICK THIS LINE


Thursday, July 30, 2020

The Securitization Debacle – A U.S. Pension Shortfall: $3.4 Trillion+ [$3,400,000,000,000] REPOSTED FROM 2019

“America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.”
― Abraham Lincoln

by Danny Hammond

I have been writing about this subject extensively, especially the devastation brought on the American people by the Democrat President Bill Clinton and the Republican dominated Congress when in 1999 they repealed the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933.  This Act which was the government's answer to what caused the Great Depression had kept the country's financial markets safe for nearly 70 years.  They Repealed the Act, but put no regulation in its place. Nine short years later the Great Wall Street Meltdown nearly broke the entire world's markets.  There is still no such regulation in place and foreclosures are still spiking and retirees are already seeing their retirement income cut.  Idiots.

Ms. Sullivan wrote this piece in 2016.  She was right on it then.  But, who do we complain to?  If we are to survive as a country, it is the people who must do the heavy lifting.   Danny Hammond


By Sydney Sullivan

looting the pension fundsPeople are wondering why unions are dwindling – it’s because of the securitization/rehypothecation scheme targeted unions to invest in their UNREGULATED DERIVATIVES,.  while Congress has done nothing to stop it. Union busting? Globalism? Agenda 21?

Shortfall. Unfunded. Underfunding.  It sounds like a minimal pension issue – however, it is anything but that. You may have heard the words “shortfall” when your state refers to its government budget or pension plan; and, if you are young (say, under 40), you’ve probably not given it a second thought. Just so you know “shortfall” is defined as “a failure to come up to expectation or need” and at 40 it seems like there will be plenty of time and ways to make up a shortfall… not so much when you are 60.

If you’re like many Americans, you’re worried about retirement. Maybe before the new century securitization scheme was launched, a “shortfall” might have been more easily explained and handled. But after 2000, the Wall Street securities system ramped up and took deficits to a new high while lining the pockets of Wall Street traders. How did this happen?
How did the USA get to over $3.4 TRILLION in unfunded pension debt? The answer is not something your Congressional or state legislators want to discuss in public …or even in confidence. What caused “shortfalls”? To understand how a state could get so severely “underfunded” with their pension funds, you must first understand that this hqdefault (1)didn’t just happen overnight. De-regulation and rule changing have been going on since the last Great Depression, though the final wallop occurred when Congress repealed Glass-Steagall in 1999. “Glass-Steagall was designed to prevent exactly the kind of collaboration that brought us the Goldman-Sachs fraud.” Source: Daily Kos.
Now, a lot of people blame a Republican Congress under the Clinton administration for the demise of Glass-Steagall – however, that is not altogether true. The House Democrats were instrumental in passing the repeal – even Nancy Pelosi (whose husband worked for Countrywide) voted “yea”. A sad fact, but true. We all make mistakes as both the parties agreed it was best to reinstate Glass-Steagall – at least as far as their party platforms go.

Check the record … how did your own Senators and Congresspersons vote?  

MORTGAGE FRAUD-THE SACKING OF ROME IN 410 AD-THE GLASS STEAGALL ACT OF 1933 AND THE REASON FOR THE USE OF FIREWALLS

"When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.”        Theodore Roosevelt




Reposted because I have always liked it and not enough people have read it.

by Danny Hammond
FIREWALLS:  This word is broadly defined. But, I think we can all agree that it is a device or strategy placed within a system to back up the day to day rules and regulations are attacked from outside or within the system and this attack bypasses the system to cause damage to that system.
I just read that and yes, it will work for the purpose of this article.

Although the date of the founding of Rome is steeped in legend and mystery, as well as some historical writings, it is generally considered to be April 21, 753 BC. Since it is a story of at least one thousand two hundred years and it has to do with brothers named Romulus and Remus and something about their mother being a She-Wolf,  for the duration of this article we will just use the above date. All agreed?  Yes.

My only reason for referencing Rome is that throughout all of its in-fighting, treachery, betrayal, greatness, open government, etc., Rome survived so long because there were always in place some "must always be so" rules.

KEEP READING  I PROMISE THIS ARTICLE IS ABOUT HOME LOAN FRAUD AND I'LL GET TO IT.  CLICK HERE


FORECLOSURE SALE- CREDIT BID, DISBURSEMENT OF THE PROCEEDS OF SALE, DEFICIENCY & SURPLUS: TOO MANY OF MY READERS DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENS AT A FORECLOSURE SALE AND WHAT THEY SHOULD HAVE KNOWN ABOUT WHAT DIDN'T HAPPEN

"The Contest is never quite over, The field never quite ours."
                                                                                   Major John Bell Hood CSA
by Danny Hammond

JUDICIAL OR NON JUDICIAL THE FORECLOSURE SALE AUCTION REQUIRED FOR THE LENDER TO BE HOLDING A CREDIT BID IN ORDER TO RECEIVE THE AMOUNT BALANCE ON YOUR PROMISSORY NOTE.  THIS IS ANOTHER OF THOSE THINGS THAT I HAVE BEEN HARPING ON THAT HASN'T HAPPENED CONCERNING FORECLOSURES SINCE 1999.  IF WE DON'T REVIVE THE LAW SOMEDAY SOON EVERYONE WILL HAVE FORGOTTEN WHAT THE LAW WAS.

FOLLOWING ARE TWO OF THE FIRST VIDEOS I MADE FOR THE ORIGINAL WEBSITE.  THEY ARE STILL GOOD. THE FIRST ONE EXPLAINS CREDIT BID, DEFICIENCY, AND SURPLUS.  THE SECOND ONE IS ME HARASSING THE SALE AUCTIONEER (TRUSTEE?) ABOUT THE CREDIT BID AT THE HOME SALE OF ONE OF MY CLIENTS. THEY WERE FILMED 9 OR 10 YEARS AGO.



VIDEO: FORECLOSURE SALE PROCEEDS, CREDIT BID, & DEFICIENCY SURPLUS?



VIDEO: JESSICA- THE FORECLOSER


VIDEO: The Credit Bid is Necessary, But, No Foreclosing Party has a legal right to use it.
Do You Want To Know Why?

Wednesday, July 29, 2020

I HAVE BEEN LOOKING FOR THE ACCOUNTING OF A NON-JUDICIAL FRAUDULENT FORECLOSURE SALE DISBURSEMENT OF THE SALE PROCEEDS.

"The reason I am working so hard is for my family because we need the money.  We need the money for food, the car, the house payment, and the lawyers.  We need the money because we live in the United States of Money."     Jake Davis in Daughters

by Danny Hammond
IF YOU HAVE BEEN FORECLOSED AND HAVE RECEIVED A REPORT OF THE FORECLOSURE SALE PROCEEDS SHOWING HOW THE MONEY WAS SPENT, AND WHETHER THERE WAS A SURPLUS OR A DEFICIENCY, THEN YOURS WOULD BE THE FIRST ONE I HAVE EVER SEEN. 

SHOULD HAVE RECEIVED OR OWED MONEY FROM THE SALE PROCEEDS?

How in the world are the courts missing this?  If you used an attorney, I bet he never brought it up. How did the attorney miss it?  It is the law in every state.  It is a defense for challenging the Standing of the foreclosing party.  This is all part of the biggest of the Big Lies ever perpetrated on the 99% of Americans.  They gotta let you know and prove how much your house sold for.  I don't mean just stick a number in the "Foreclosure Deed".   I mean prove it.         
CONTINUE READING

Thursday, July 16, 2020

ARE YOU READY TO SUE YOUR JUDGE AND STOP LOOKING FOR ALTERNATIVES? DOES YOUR FORECLOSURE CASE SEEM TO DEFY LOGIC? FREE ZOOM CLASS

"A settled plan to deprive the people of the benefits, blessings, and ends of the contract, to subvert the fundamentals of the constitution, to deprive them of all share in making and executing laws, will justify a revolution.'''  

                                        John  Adams, Novanglus Papers, 1774




We are facing the destruction of our constitution.  It will require a revolution to put things back as they were.  I don't mean a violent revolution.  I mean an effective one.  It isn't just a good idea to save your house from foreclosure.  The suing of judges who don't believe that Article III applies to them is a civic duty


Danny Hammond's Zoom Meetings

COMING SOON



by Danny Hammond

I have never believed that I would be able to make a template for a WRONGFUL FORECLOSURE CASE based on DEPRIVATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS.
But, I was wrong. I have created a cookie-cutter lawsuit that is short, sweet, and targets the only person in yours or any court who allowed all of the crime, deception, and property theft.
You know who it is, your judge. The criminal attorneys and fake foreclosing parties could never have pulled off any foreclosures without JUDGES depriving Borrowers of multiple civil rights by not doing the job that we are paying them to do.
There are only 3 reasons a judge could force you to lose to racketeering enterprises that steal homes thousands of times never getting caught while Borrowers are stuck researching and flailing away at saving their doomed homes.
The 3 reasons a judge would allow it in his or her court?
1. Your judge is stupid and barely passed the bar 20 years ago and never studied law since.
2. Your judge is wildly misinformed. He thinks that no borrower should get a home for free in his court. So, he is going to give your house to a foreclosing party who has no right to collect money for free.
3. Your judge is a crook.
I have thought about it. Your frustration is that you know that the foreclosing party is breaking the law in a United States court. So you are targeting the wrong parties. You are trying to expose SPS, Green Tree, Ocwen etc., and their attorneys as criminal fraudsters. But, how can they commit these crimes so blatantly?
It isn't all of the parties that you have to beat. It is only the person controlling your whole case. It is only this one official that can ignore evidence and case law.
It isn't an attorney, a servicer, a Fictitious Payee claiming he has the right to foreclose.
IT IS YOUR JUDGE! Why are you leaving the judge alone?
The Judge controls your fate by controlling the fate of your house and he is allowing the attorneys to run amuck.
I am looking for 1-3 Borrowers who really want to save their home and who will agree that what I am saying is the only way to get the damn judge out of the way.
Tomorrow I am going to begin the final work on my three cases. I have one Borrower who is all in and I am beginning to outline his case. But, I am doing this full-time now. I don't have an income so I am inviting committed Borrowers to fight back using the only real laws left in place. Constitutional civil rights.
I will add Borrowers so that we can start multiple ruckuses in multiple locations.
I will need one Borrower at $900 per month for two months to follow this all the way through.

That is all I feel comfortable with. It isn't enough money, but I am not an attorney and if I win my three cases I will get my retirement and my life back. So, I will get myself and the first Borrower done and follow through with whatever comes next.
I will take on three more cases that fit my model. I will not talk about wrongful foreclosure or teach "Chain of Title" or Mortgage Fraud any longer. I am going to sue some judges using the laws that are meant to keep judges from running amuck and harming citizens. The judge is a citizen nothing more.
I am going to hold a Zoom class tomorrow at 4 pm to answer questions and debate my sanity. I am very rarely wrong on this subject. 
There will be no charge to attend and ask me questions. Vet me. Punch a hole in what I say. If I am wrong that would be easy to uncover. 
I will only consider going further with Borrowers who attend this class. If no one attends, then I will just take on the cases I have. There will be no more offers. 
This is going to be tough and I am going to have to concentrate on behalf of whoever joins in.


VIDEO: STOPPING FORECLOSURE: TO SAVE YOUR HOUSE, YOU MUST PUSH YOUR JUDGE OUT OF THE WAY!

     

Thursday, July 2, 2020

A Simple Question. I Hope I Provided a Simple Answer. I Think I Wrote a Post: WHEN I SAY YOU SHOULD SUE YOUR WRONGFUL FORECLOSURE CASE JUDGE, THAT IS FOR SIMPLIFICATION; YOU WILL ACTUALLY SUE A CITIZEN WHO IS A JUDGE WHENEVER HE IS NOT DEPRIVING OTHER CITIZENS OF THEIR CIVIL RIGHTS JOB IS

"Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat."  -Tzun Tzu 4000 BC give or take



AXJ NEW YORK: Danny Hammond we at Actions for Justice ( AXJ ) go as far as stating that housing is a human right and in the case of homeowners would prevail over any repayment of a debt. Your opinion?

 · Reply · 21h

Danny Hammond  Well, it is a step too far without clarification. It is bad enough to have to consider a suing a judge, which is how I say it for simplification, you actually are suing a citizen who is a judge whenever he is not depriving citizens of constitutional "civil" rights.


But, when he moves a case forward without reviewing the pleadings of the foreclosing party for the claim of injury and the "concrete and particularized" evidence at the very BEGINNING of a contract law case, he and his court (one and the same) do not have the absolutely required "Subject Matter Jurisdiction". The court has no choice but to dismiss the case, or in non-judicial states vacate and set aside the illegal non-judicial foreclosure.

To move the case forward is to commit the most heinous of crimes possible.  Deprivation of Civil Rights, under color of law. This cannot be done and everything that happens after this is void ab initio. "Void at the beginning". Never not "void". 

A judge can be proven to have taken a bribe and when his ruling injures you, he still maintains his immunity from a party to sue him for damages. The difference is that the bribed judge may be in a "judicial setting" and therefore is still a judge. Continue Reading