MORTGAGE FRAUD WAS NOT ONLY NEVER FIXED, BUT IT WAS ALSO NEVER CHANGED AT ALL. FORECLOSING PARTIES ARE STILL ASSIGNING MORTGAGES AND DEEDS OF TRUST TO TRANSFER THE OWNERSHIP OF YOUR DEBT. THE SUPREME COURT MADE IT CLEAR THAT AN ASSIGNMENT OF A MORTGAGE HAS NO EFFECT... IN 1872!

Friday, March 12, 2021

THE LETTER: A Letter From A US Citizen Whom, It Seems, Feels The Same Way As Me About The Problem Of Judges Using Their Jobs, Without Constraints, To Abuse The Meanings Of Constitutional Law And To Violate Their Own Oaths

 

I have not edited any of the words of this letter, however, I did add spacing since the writer (perhaps a bad student) wrote this harsh observation as a single paragraph and it was a little hard to read.   DLH

 


THE LETTER:


At the establishment of our constitutions, the judiciary bodies were supposed to be the most helpless and harmless members of the government.

Experience, however, soon showed in what way they were to become the most dangerous;

that the insufficiency of the means provided for their removal gave them a freehold and irresponsibility in office; that their decisions, seeming to concern individual suitors only, pass silent and unheeded by the public at large;

that these decisions, nevertheless, become law by precedent, sapping, by little and little, the foundations of the constitution, and working its change by construction, before anyone has perceived that that invisible and helpless worm has been busily employed in consuming its substance.

In truth, man is not made to be trusted for life, if secured against all liability to account.

                              Thomas Jefferson: letter to Monsieur A. Coray, Oct 31, 1823



Thursday, February 18, 2021

For What It's Worth- Buffalo Springfield: IT WAS YOUNG PEOPLE, ORGANIZED AND EARNEST, FACING DANGER WHO PROTESTED AS A LARGE GROUP THAT EXPOSED OUTRAGEOUS GOVERNMENT LIES AND CAUSED THE END OF THE VIETNAM WAR

 BORROWERS HAVE NO VOICE BECAUSE THEY WILL NOT WORK AS A GROUP TO ADDRESS THE UNBELIEVABLE CRIMES BEING COMMITTED BY THEIR GOVERNMENT AND EVEN WORSE THEIR JUDICIAL SYSTEM IN UNIVERSAL AND ORGANIZED CRIME


ARE YOU INTERESTED IN JOINING A PROTEST OF NAMES ON PETITIONS MASS MAILED TO THE IMPORTANT PEOPLE THAT SHOULD KNOW, BUT DON'T TALK ABOUT IT, OR THE COMPLETELY UNINFORMED WHO DON'T KNOW THAT THERE HAVE BEEN 25 MILLION FRAUDULENT  FORECLOSURES IN THE US SINCE 1999?

LEARN MORE HERE


This is the first protest song that I ever heard that I knew it was a protest song.  I watched the new movie "The Trial of the Chicago Seven".  This song has been going through my head for the last month.  It seems like yesterday that I bought the album.  It was actually a lot of yesterdays.


Students Facing Chicago Police in Full Battle Gear - 1968 Democrat Inaugural Convention in Chicago



FOR WHAT IT'S WORTH

There's something happening here, But what it is ain't exactly clear

There's a man with a gun over there, Telling me I got to beware


I think it's time we stop  Children, what's that sound?
Everybody look, what's going down

There's battle lines being drawn, Nobody's right if everybody's wrong
Young people speaking their minds, Getting so much resistance from behind

It's time we stop Hey, what's that sound?
Everybody look, what's going down.

What a field day for the heat, A thousand people in the street, Singing songs and they carrying signs,  Mostly say, "Hooray! for our side

Paranoia strikes deep, Into your life, it will creep
It starts when you're always afraid, Step out of line, the men come and take you away

We better stop, Hey, what's that sound? Everybody look, what's going down?

You better stop

Hey, what's that sound? 

Everybody look, what's going down?

You better stop

Now, what's that sound?

Everybody look, what's going down?

You better stop

Children, what's that sound?

Everybody look, what's going down?


Yeah. Let's all look at what's going on.  It is simpler than you think.  But, stop trying to use citation law and statute law to deal with outlaws.  I tried it for 12 years.  It is stupid to believe in that strategy.

Except when it is being ignored by judges, root law comes from the constitution and it is in effect.  But, when we begin to add judges as the defendant citizens that they were when they moved their courts forward they will try to fight it.  We don't know from where they will seek help.  We must be ready to add any judge illegally defending or trying to insulate the judge, we must add these little helper judges to our lawsuits as additional defendants.

You want to stay in your home or get it back and you are researching too hard.   The bad guys don't know that they are in a fight when you are pontificating on Facebook.  

We, Borrowers, need to become visible or we will still be ignored until even we forget what we were trying to get done.  The fraudulent Chain of Title will become the only chain.


My Next Zoom Q & A will be scheduled for Wed. Feb 22nd at 7:00 pm Central Time.  Only Borrowers who have gone to my website (foreclosurefraudanswers.blogspot.com) and filled in their name and email will receive links.  Those of you that have attended one or more of my Sessions before and who are on the email list will be able to request a link 





Tuesday, February 2, 2021

From The Mortgage Fraud "Pro Se" Series by Danny Hammond: I Am Going To Show You Why I Say, "If You Hire An Attorney You Will Lose"- Neil Garfield has gotta go!

At the establishment of our constitutions, the judiciary bodies were supposed to be the most helpless and harmless members of the government.

Experience, however, soon showed in what way they were to become the most dangerous; 

that the insufficiency of the means provided for their removal gave them a freehold and irresponsibility in office; that their decisions, seeming to concern individual suitors only, pass silent and unheeded by the public at large;

that these decisions, nevertheless, become law by precedent, sapping, by little and little, the foundations of the constitution, and working its change by construction, before anyone has perceived that that invisible and helpless worm has been busily employed in consuming its substance.
  
In truth, man is not made to be trusted for life, if secured against all liability to account.

                                                     Thomas Jefferson: letter to Monsieur A. Coray, Oct 31, 1823


NEWS FLASH!!

I have to add something astounding to this article.  I had a borrower send me 3 Neil Garfield articles.  I don't know if he was being smug, or if he had a question, or if it didn't mean anything.

I answered him by asking him what he wanted and why he would send me Neil Garfield's articles.  As I was shutting down my computer, just now, I had to shut down his emails from my screen.  Then I saw something that I had never noticed.  Neil has his credentials on his website.  We know he is an attorney, so that is pretty bad for a Borrower to have to see.  But, just below, I am going to show you my 2nd email to this Borrower.  I could not believe it.  If you have never read this article, this writing in red is going to be a real spoiler.  SPOILER ALERT!

My email:

To:  A Borrower

From the shaken Danny Hammond

I had never seen his former careers:  He has received multiple academic and achievement awards in

business and law. He is a former investment banker, securities broker, securities analyst, and

financial analyst


Neil's attributes from his website.
__________________________________________________________________________________

Please Donate to Support Neil Garfield’s Efforts to

Stop Foreclosure Fraud.

Click     [DO NOT PRESS THIS LINK.  IT IS PAYPAL]

*
Neil F Garfield, MBA, JD, 73, is a Florida licensed trial and appellate attorney since 1977.
He has received multiple academic and achievement awards in business and law.

He is a former investment banker, securities broker, securities analyst, and
financial analyst.
________________________________________________________________________________________


My God the man is the Anti-Christ!!

Those are exactly the perfect credentials to steal homes.
He is proud of what he has done.
Reposted out of dread
by Danny Hammond

I am not an attorney.  Thank god.  I am not a lawyer.  I don't even know the difference.  You must not construe what I say and write as the learned knowledge spewing from someone who only took 3 credit hours on real estate in law school and passed the bar.  Although, I really do believe that I could pass the bar right now.  But, warning!! I am not an attorney!!  Another warning!!! Who would believe that an attorney who only took 3 credit hours of real estate law is capable of going up against the Gangsters that you have been dealing with?  Do not take my advice as an attorney.  I am not an attorney and that is good news for you.  I am a real estate broker and a mortgage broker with 30 years of credits in real estate law and mortgage documents.  I brokered the loan on my own house.   CONTINUE READING    

DO NOT QUIT READING.  CLICK ON THE BLUE "CONTINUE READING"!  THIS ARTICLE IS NOW A PERFECT DESCRIPTION OF THE "CHAOS" THEORY OF MORTGAGE FRAUD.  IF YOU DON'T READ IT ALL, YOU WILL BE GOING BACKWARD. 

Wednesday, January 27, 2021

"SUE YOUR FORECLOSURE JUDGE": That Slogan Is Not Completely Correct In Essence; It Is A Simple Phrase I Use To Get Your Attention Directed To The Inescapable Fact That There Is Only One Party Responsible For ALL Of The Illegal Acts In Your Foreclosure Case

Get a Review of Your Foreclosure Case

by Danny Hammond

If you have been wanting to know more about my "Sue Your Foreclosure Judge" slogan, the truth is that it should be called: 

"Sue The Citizen That Was Not A Judge Because He Had Disobeyed His Oath And Constitutional Law When He Had Not Reviewed The Filings To Determine Whether The Foreclosing Party Had Met the Constitutional Requirements For Standing".

However, that is not as catchy or as easy to understand.

This subject brings 12,000 visits to my website each and every month.  But, I am puzzled that I don't understand the reason why they come.

When I do the Zoom classes I never have anyone argue or debate whether I am right.  I get many questions and seems like Borrowers understand the answers.  Then they leave that thought and start telling me every mean and nasty thing that was done to them by everyone that participated in cases that lasted 2 to 12 years.  None of that matters.  Their cases, my cases, your case, they are all void and they never happened anyway.  We are all still at the beginning of the case.  At the starting line.  Your judge has already injured you and his actions represent the worst violations of law that a judge can commit.

I have told you the reason your case has lasted too long, but I have somehow done all of you a disservice.  I am not getting across to you that your research, and studying, and collaborating with Borrowers who have had similar experiences, and hiring attorneys is, all of it, wasting your time, lowering your resolve, and spending more money than you have.

In other words, that paragraph is the only plan that the bad guys have used since 2001.  Their antics are part of some grand scheme to get you to research and collaborate with others and hire attorneys to take up your time, lower your resolve and break your back and ass.  They could not do it if judges were just doing a bad job of carrying out the law.  But, no.  They are giving it all that they got to take your house and give it to a stranger and break CONSTITUTIONAL LAWS concerning your civil rights to Due Process of Law which can be found in the 5th and 14th amendments to the Constitution and which are civil rights.

What happens when you hear what I say and you believe my reasoning, but you can't quite see why it is true.  I think that it is because what I am telling you is "UNBELIEVABLE".  And it really is.  

But, now you have seen an attempted "coup d'├ętat" by a group of Americans whose goal was to take over the government in the building where the government was governing the United States in order to overthrow the democratically elected government.  And please.  Don't accuse me of being for a democrat or republican, or whatever else your weakness to fend off conspiracy lies makes you believe.  You are on my website.  I am trying to help you for free.  It shouldn't make any difference if I was a martian.  Get over yourself.

CONTINUE READING:  This one is IMPORTANT


Get a Review of Your Foreclosure Case


Saturday, December 19, 2020

IT IS ALWAYS THE INNOCENTS. THEY ARE JUST FAMILIES WHO BELIEVE IN THEIR COUNTRY AND ITS SYSTEM OF JUSTICE. I'M SICK OF IT. THE CRIME IS ALWAYS DONE THE SAME STUPID LITTLE WAY. THE DEVIL IS IN THE DETAIL

Each Case Looks Different.  Each Borrower Thinks That His or Her Case Has Special Details of Fraud or Criminal Behavior.  Their Cases Are Not Different. Your Case Is Not Different.

So, Listen Up Kiddos.  Here Are The Details That The Devil Is In (Learn it, Love it, Live it)

"A settled plan to deprive the people of the benefits, blessings, and ends of the contract, to subvert the fundamentals of the constitution, to deprive them of all share in making and executing laws, will justify a revolution.'''  
                                        John  Adams, Novanglus Papers, 1774

When I get a call from a Borrower wanting to talk over their foreclosure situation I always show them that they have nothing new, by showing them a magic trick.  I tell them that I need two pieces of their records to put their case into a timeline.  (See my article "It is a Straight Line" Everything is a Straight Line").

There are basically two sets of records in every case that exist and that have been based on the same set of fraudulent information since 1999.  It never changes.  There is no good reason to think about it.  It makes no difference if your state is a judicial foreclosure state or a non-judicial foreclosure state.  It doesn't matter if there is a server named Ocwen, Greentree, SPS, or the newly discovered Planet Mortgage.  (The real name of a new mtg broker.)

The two sets of records are:

1.) The court docket is the listed items that have been "filed" into your case in the order and the date that they were recorded.  This begins with a lawsuit (sometimes called a Complaint or Petition) and runs until there is an order or ruling which ("appears") to end the case.  In a case filed before 1999, this filed order probably did end the case.  That is not true, but we will get to that.

The docket includes everything that makes any difference which was filed by you, the foreclosing party, and the court.

2.)  All of the instruments, documents, liens, and other "things" that have been recorded by the recorder's office in your county on or against or for the legal description in your case.  If your case is a Federal Court the filed docket is there and the recorded "things of all kinds" affecting the legal description of your property are still at your county recorder's office.

First I will go in the loose order of what I expect I am going to see in every case.

CONTINUE READING


Get a Review of Your Foreclosure Case


Wednesday, December 2, 2020

WE HAVE FINALLY SIMPLIFIED THE DEMAND FOR DISMISSAL AND THE FOLLOW-UP LAWSUIT AGAINST THE FORECLOSURE JUDGE FOR DEPRIVATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS AS WELL AS OTHER COUNTS INCLUDING MESNE DAMAGES

 This article has been rewritten in its entirety on 12-02-2020
"The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made."

Groucho Marx


ARE YOU MENTALLY READY TO GO AFTER YOUR JUDGE FOR STEALING YOUR HOME?

ARE YOU FINANCIALLY READY TO GO AFTER YOUR HOME AND BRING IT BACK WITH YOU?

     MAYBE YOU ARE ONE OF THE 5 OF US GOING AFTER JUDGES RIGHT NOW.  

 READ THIS ARTICLE NOW!

BROKEN JUSTICE - IT IS OUR CIVIC DUTY TO RESCUE IT

            BROKEN JUSTICE - OUR CIVIC DUTY TO FIX IT

                                  If you are interested fill out the form by clicking this line



by Danny Hammond

THIS MOTION WE ARE ABOUT TO FILE WILL BE  DIRECTED AT THE JUDGE AND NO OTHER PARTY.

IT IS A RULE 12 (b)(1) MOTION AND AS WRITTEN NOW HAS SOME QUALITIES OF A TEMPLATE IN ITS UNIFORM ARRANGEMENT AND BECAUSE MORE THAN 60% OF THE CONTENT APPLIES TO EVERY POSSIBLE CASE,

THIS CAN CUT DOWN ON THE TIME TO CREATE THE FIRST AND POSSIBLY THE ONLY TWO FILINGS FOR WINNING YOUR LAWSUIT AGAINST THE CITIZEN THAT YOU THOUGHT WAS YOUR JUDGE.

THE STRATEGIES ARE NOW NEARLY THE SAME FOR OVERTURNING A LAWSUIT THAT ALREADY HAS AN ALLEGED JUDGMENT AGAINST YOU AND YOUR HOME.  THAT JUDGMENT AGAINST YOU WAS "VOID AB INITIO", WHICH MEANS THE VERY MOMENT THE JUDGE WROTE IT.  AT THAT MOMENT, YOUR JUDGE COMMITTED THE MOST EGREGIOUS CRIME THAT A JUDGE CAN COMMIT.

Was Your House Stolen By Some Greedy Bastards Who Took You To Court So That They Could Steal Your Home And Sell It Just Because They Needed A Bigger Boat?

Are You As Mad As Hell And You Don't Want To Take It Any More?  Join the revolution.

If you are interested in joining in as one of five replacement Borrower clients, then:

We need money to create each of the five filings 1 & 2 into a court.  So each of these five must be able to pay on time and have an organized file of both the trial documents (if any).

and,

This Borrower client must also have an organized file of the recorded documents against or for the legal description of your property.

We had already started on creating all five lawsuits (Petition, Complaint, or whatever your local courts call a lawsuit), at the same time.  One of mine and the four clients we are looking for. 

We will file all five by December 15th.  Unless someone in the judiciary or our government commits a crime this strategy will not take more than three months and more probably two months.

We are filing all five of the first Motions that are creating a constitutional question to force the judge to perform all duties that the Constitution directs him to and to do it without violating the oath he took when he got the job. 

CONTINUE READING                                                  Get Help With Your Case

Friday, November 20, 2020

SOMETHING WICKED THIS WAY COMES, WALL STREET IS UP TO SOMETHING CONCERNING OUR HOMES AND I DON'T THINK WE ARE GOING TO LIKE IT: MORTGAGE FRAUD

"I've got to keep in some sort of touch with all the loose ends of this dizzy affair if I'm ever gonna make heads or tails of it."
                                                       Sam Spade



by Danny Hammond

Yes! Something is up in Wall Street Land.  I, and dozens of Mortgage Fraud experts have been expecting a very large spike in foreclosures.  There are a lot of judicial and non-judicial foreclosures going on as I speak.  I haven't tried to confirm if they are mostly non-conforming loans which doesn't mean that the people have a bad loan.  Non-Conforming Loans simply don't conform to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac's rules and conditions.  My requests for help from Borrowers are much higher than I have had at any time.   And this is really my point.  We seem to have as many as four vaccines that have completed testing and are ready for approval.  By the end of December mass vaccinations will begin and all hell is going to break loose when all of the frozen foreclosures thaw out at the same time.   If you are one of the millions who have been waiting and hoping for the miracle that government will continue the freeze don't wait any longer.  It is the government's entities that have been held up and nothing is going to stop the tsunami of foreclosures that will follow when they are cut loose.

(Here I think that some confusing terms need clarification.  This is true for home loans in general, the confusing terms come from the old common law which was in place for hundreds of years before being clarified in the Uniform Commercial Code.  For this article let's go through the synonyms that sound different but are actually interchangeable.

[The Borrower is the]                                  [The Lender, Foreclosing Party, Servicer, ]

Mortgagor                                                    Mortgagee
Obligor                                                        Obligee
Issuer                                                           Issuee
Grantor                                                       Grantee

The differences here are minor, but all of them mean it was the Borrower that created the flow of funds to the home loan by signing the original Promissory Note and the collateral instrument (mortgage or Deed of Trust) over to the actual Lender or Holder in Due Course using his or her signature.

FHA, Hud, FHFA, FNMA, and Freddie are all unable to have their servicers or correspondents foreclose on government conforming loans which are the vast majority of loans due to a government moratorium on foreclosures due to the Covid-19 pandemic.  This brings up a lot of bad things for a lot of American citizens.  You are in foreclosure due to fraud that the government could easily fix by making all judges run their courts as directed by Article III of the constitution.  So, the government puts no one in jail and our courts give our homes to funny-sounding parties, such as one I saw today "PLANET MORTGAGE" which has no right to foreclose.  I have never seen a foreclosing party in any state even try to meet the Constitutional, Irreducible, Minimum Requirements of Article III STANDING.

CONTINUE READING                                                        Get Help With Your Case

Tuesday, November 3, 2020

From "The Pro Se Series by Danny Hammond: THE IMPORTANCE OF CHALLENGING THE CONSTITUTIONAL STANDING TO FORECLOSE CONCERNING YOUR FRAUDULENT LENDER AND THE "SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION" OF THE COURT. THIS IS EXACTLY THE SAME IN BOTH JUDICIAL AND NON-JUDICIAL FORECLOSURES AND STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS

“Until you guys own your own souls you don't own mine. Until you guys can be trusted every time and always, in all times and conditions, to seek the truth out and find it and let the chips fall where they may—until that time comes, I have the right to listen to my conscience and protect my client the best way I can. Until I'm sure you won't do him more harm than you'll do the truth good. Or until I'm hauled before somebody that can make me talk."      Raymond Chandler "High Window"


IF YOU ONLY RETAIN THREE WORDS FROM THIS POST YOU WILL NOT HAVE WASTED YOUR TIME.


THE WORDS ARE:  "INJURY IN FACT"


Article III of the Constitution of the United States as defined by the U.S. Supreme Court has long ago established a constitutional, irreducible, minimum set of requirements for a party in a genuine dispute to establish that it has the Standing to redress a claimed "Injury In Fact" before it can bring a dispute before any court.

Without the existence of Standing all courts in the land must acknowledge that the court has no subject matter jurisdiction to hear any merits of a case and that it has no choice whatsoever but to dismiss the subject action.

In Borrower's cases, this subject action is the claim that the foreclosing party is the party in interest that has the "right" to foreclose on a Borrower's property and that it is claiming and proving that it has been injured by the Borrower enabling its right to foreclose.
The three requirements to prove Standing in a case involving Judicial Foreclosure state foreclosure actions in which the foreclosing party is the Plaintiff and the Borrower is the defendant.

1.  The foreclosing party is the Plaintiff and it must claim and prove in its lawsuit against the Borrower, who is the defendant, that it has sustained an "Injury in Fact" due to the actions of the Borrower and that it is demonstrating that its evidence is "concrete and particularized".

The Borrower Defendant's "only burden" is that he must deny ever having been in default with this Plaintiff in this case.  This will be true in nearly every case.

2.  This injury must be have been proven by the foreclosing party with "concrete and particularized" evidence to be fairly traceable to the foreclosed party with concrete and particularized evidence.   

The Defendant Borrower is trying to void and set aside the foreclosure sale that the foreclosing party claims were legal and that it has already happened properly although it has never yet been presented in any court.

 I do not use the words lender or bank because I have never seen any party in a foreclosure trial ever even try to prove a Lender's status.  So, whenever reading my writings you will see me use the term "foreclosing party" instead of giving this entity any higher status before the judge.

Your foreclosing party has only one possible injury it can claim.  That the foreclosing party used its’ own money to fund the closing of the loan, or used its’ own money to purchase the alleged subject Promissory Note and did not get paid back you, the mortgagor.

 I have never seen the foreclosing party ever claim or state that it had suffered an “Injury in Fact”, nor ever described one.

CONTINUE READING  VERY IMPORTANT ARTICLE


WOULD YOU LIKE A FREE ASSESSMENT OF YOUR FORECLOSURE CASE? 

Monday, November 2, 2020

THE CONSTITUTIONAL, IRREDUCIBLE, MINIMUM, REQUIREMENTS FOR ARTICLE III STANDING AS DEFINED BY THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT- From "The Pro Se Series" by Danny Hammond: MORTGAGE FRAUD PRO SE PRIMER 101 #4:

“All power is originally vested in, and consequently derived from, the people.”

The United States Constitution


by Danny Hammond

The judge promised when he took the job that he, or she, would enforce and protect the laws that come from the constitution and that they would defend the court ferociously from losing the public trust in the integrity of the court.

Maybe that was too much to ask from some pompous asses. Why did we all expect more of judges and 
attorneys anyway? If I am any part of the public, then I can tell you for sure, the courts have already lost some of MY public trust.

It is difficult for me to pull Borrowers back from their searches for Promissory Notes, and the Assignments of Mortgage, MERS, PSA, etc., etc., thinking like Dick Tracy and Perry Mason, as well as Captain Kirk looking for a way to "prove" that the party trying to foreclose on them does not have the authority, or, STANDING, to do so.

But, if what I say is true and the judges are letting the attorneys run amuck like the 2nd graders in my description, who can blame the attorneys for running amuck. "Amuck" is quickly becoming synonymous with the "actions of the courts". To me.

If you had seen judges simply ignore proof when it is presented as much as I have, then what I am now really trying to say is that this whole thing is only about Standing and nothing else. The initial burden of determining if the foreclosing party is a party with Standing is the review of the concrete and particularized evidence and the review of that evidence of the burden of proof is on the judge, NOT ON THE BORROWER. 


Saturday, October 31, 2020

THE USE OF THE CONSTITUTION vs TRYING OVER AND OVER TO FIND A WAY TO CONVINCE A JUDGE HE DOESN'T KNOW HIS ASS FROM A HOLE IN THE GROUND AS HE VIOLATES HIS CONSTITUTIONAL OATH OVER AND OVER IN FORECLOSURE FRAUD CASES

VIDEO: THE THREE SIMPLE WORDS THAT ARE NEEDED TO WIN MORTGAGE FRAUD FORECLOSURE CASES!

"INJURY IN FACT"

THE FORECLOSURE SOLUTIONS GROUP: CIVIL RIGHTS SERIES

 If you fall during your life, it doesn't matter. You're never a failure as long as you try to get up. 
                                                                                                                          Evel Knievel



by Danny Hammond

Tuesday, October 6, 2020

MORTGAGE FRAUD: It Is A Straight Line! Your Entire Fraudulent Foreclosure Case Is Based On A Straight Line With No Gaps. But In Today's Corrupted System There Are Always Unexplainable Gaps.

“I decided I could lose nothing by the soft approach. If that didn't produce for me—and I didn't think it would—nature could take its course and we could bust up the furniture.”                                  

Phillip Marlowe character from Raymond Chandler's – The Lady In The Lake 


                                         
by Danny Hammond
I have read and I still read many messages from Borrowers who are looking for help against mortgage fraud and wrongful foreclosure involving their homes.  Lately, I have run into several Facebook Groups that exist for their members to collaborate and share their own searches on the internet and strategies that they have heard about or read about.  There are some issues with this that are causing them to get overwhelmed and stuck.  I know a lot about this.  

Not because I am so smart, but because I have gotten overwhelmed and stuck.

It was easier for me to overcome because I learned about the Chain of Title of records recorded against the property that houses sit on starting at 12 years old with my Dad.  Most people never really deal with it more than once or twice in their lives.


Everything in life has a straight line.  A beginning and the middle and the end.  They never change positions.  In real estate, the straight line is usually more obvious than say a drive across the country.

Borrowers are missing this because judges of courts involving disputes in foreclosure cases are not making the Foreclosing Parties detail the straight line in which the Foreclosing Party came to have an interest in ownership of the debt that was created when a Borrower received a loan from an alleged lender to purchase a house.  These judges have constitutional directives to start a case by reading what the Foreclosing Party details about the transactions it was involved in to legally loan the money or to purchase the loan.
CONTINUE READING

Sunday, October 4, 2020

WHAT IF YOUR WRONGFUL FORECLOSURE WAS ALREADY VOID, BUT YOU WERE UNAWARE OF IT?

If you don't stick to your values when they're being tested, they're not values: they're hobbies.
                 Jon Stewart



by Danny Hammond of the 3/4 court press
email: info.mtgfrd@gmail.com
I have just read a very long email from a borrower who was trying to tell me how he had proven over and over that the foreclosing party which does not exist, did not have the right to foreclose. He has been in court for years and suffered nearly unimaginable suffering and pain and costs.

But, I can imagine. I can remember. Trying to figure out the courts shouldn't be that hard, should it? The court seems crazy. But, what if Chuck's court is only incompetent? What if this judge is just a no-talent judge guy. This judge won't learn anything because the other judge guys will protect him from the Borrower. He will protect his other judge guys so too... so they won't learn anything either. That's how judges go. They are Knuckleheads. They all used to be attorney guys.

I know this is true. After years of working it out, I know that the majority of judges in these mortgage fraud cases are hopelessly devoid of knowledge of, or experience with, real estate chains of title.

When I reply to him I know what I will say. It has been going around in my head like a song for a year. It will go something like this:

CONTINUE READING